May your year be bright, productive, happy and peaceful!
Orange County, FL has become the second school district I know of that has decide that giving students a zero on a assignment causes the kids to lose hope of passing so they just quit. To address this problem, the worst grade you can give them is a 50 instead of a zero. That way they can recover from one missed assignment. Huh?!?! No, you read this right. The school superintendent was quoted in the SunSentinel as saying that only 43 percent of the students who received a 50 actually recovered to pass the class with a D. I have several questions. First, how does this policy teach these kids any responsibility? For the kids that do their work, how is that fair? What message does this policy send to the kids? Be a lazy dumbass and do nothing and you can still pass? That reinforces the concept of entitlement which we all agree is a problem in society that we need to overcome. Finally, if one missed assignment causes the kids to fail, why are there not more assignments so missing one is not fatal? That is what happens with my students (who still get a zero for not doing an assignment).
It would seem that such a policy is not based on an educational goal but more like a political one to improve school perception. That is as bad an idea as having kids beg for money for uniforms and class trips etc. Kids do not sell anything they just beg for money. So are we teaching them that begging and panhandling is an acceptable career? Seriously what impression does that provide to these young minds? How does either experience prepare kids for the real world where doing nothing gets you fired, not rewarded, and begging for money vs actually work is also not rewarded.
Once upon a time, education was the purview of the wealthy. American businesses argued that a basic education was needed to train a workforce for industrial jobs. The American public education system was created with this in mind- to train the next generation of workers. With education came great social and economic advancement. We clearly are deviating from that goal. Students need a good foundation in math, writing and reading (in English!), civics and science so they understand social responsibility, can communicate, understand how things work the world and can solve complex problems. They do not need pseudo-science or politicized science, but real science. Business understands this. But where is the business community on job training in schools? It would seem the business community has abdicated their responsibility to local districts who are trying to meet political goals, not economic goals. Why are we not using all the extensive testing to figure out the strengths of students and encourage them to play to those strengths? Not every kid can go to college, or should, but that does not mean they cannot achieve or be successful. They may need different training to hone their strengths.
Back in the day my Dad told me that as the education system was developed in his hometown of Detroit, students were given aptitude tests. I was also. The kids were divided up based on skills and aptitude. Students were even sent to different schools as they got older that tailored programs to their interests and skills set. Kids that the schools system felt had the aptitude to succeed in college had different courses than students that were less academically included but perhaps more mechanical, more artisan, more labor, clerical, etc. Different kids go training to help them succeed with their skills. Less academic did not mean less inclined to succeed or be successful. just differently. And they had a better chance to be successful. We seem to miss that today.
Today we have parents insisting that everyone be treated the same, and that no kid gets left behind. But putting kids with different aptitudes, maturity, and academic inclinations in one class is destined to either fail for all, or fail for everyone but the average. Such a protocol begets policies like Orange (and Broward) County that direct teachers to adjust grades so “Little Johnny” doesn’t feel bad. Extensive college prep testing and disconnected learning discourage the less academic kids, leading to dropping out, or other behaviors. Such policies and expectations by parent and political leaders are not helpful for building an educated society. Instead we need to search further into the root causes. Are there too few assignments? Are they too disconnected for students to appreciate? Should we sort out strengths and treat different students differently to discourage disinterest? How do we assess their strengths and design programs to help students succeed. And who takes responsibility for these kids? And perhaps we should revisit some of the lessons learned from the early years of the industrial development (1930s) to figure out what they did well, and see how policies today frustrate those goals. Maybe the way forward is rooted in the past.
I hope you and your have a very happy holiday season – whatever holidays you may be celebrating. And I hope that 2014 has been a good year for you and that 2015 will be happier still. The end of the year is a good time to reflect on all the positive things in our lives. For most of us we have food, shelter, a decent job, transportation and friends. We have clean water, sewer systems to remove waste, trash pickup and decent highways (Thank you civil engineers!).. We are relatively safe and have access to good medical care. And we have friends and family that we care about and want to share with. ‘Tis the season to be jolly, happy, merry and all those other words. Happy Holidays to all!
An an update, please note this link – $1 million being spent on DPR. In addition to over 20 completed projects by the WaterReuse Research Foundation
How did southeast Florida not end up on the list of US cities with the worst drivers? This seems like an annual rite for us and if you have lived down here you know why. Things have not improved, so what does that say for Worcester, MA, Boston, Washington DC and Springfield MA that they took the top 4 spots? Sometimes it is good not to be number 1! LOL
A group called Idaho for Wildlife requested and got approval for a hunting contest open to children on public lands whereby they will attempt to be the child who kills the most wolves. What could possibly go wrong here? First the only ones with guns are children. Those children are running around public lands trying to shoot the most wolves. We assume there are people with them, but since they are trying to kill the most wolves, I would expect more shooting than normal. So what if the critter is a coyote or fox or missing German shepard or guy working on a water system? And aren’t we trying to bring wolves back because we have figured out that eliminating them vastly impacts the ecosystem negatively. Maybe if Idaho for Wildlife (interesting misconcepted title) thinks there are too many wolves, wouldn’t trapping a few and releasing them in a place that maybe needs some would be a better idea?
Have we passed peak diamonds? Just as a prior blog outlined the concept of peak oil, gas, metals etc, the recent news not suggests that diamond miners are decreasing their exploration investments because the number of new finds is decreasing each year, and those found are far more expensive to extract than the current values. Sounds like oil? We find less each year, it is more expensive and current oilfield yields are on the decrease. Phosphorous is similarly situated which is why there is much research taking place to find means to recover phosphorous from ag lands and wastewater effluent – recover phosphorous meant to be resold to ag interests as fertilizer as the price of phosphorous continues to increase as a result so increasing demand and decreasing supplies.
We are also being told that while peak diamonds have passed perhaps chocolate will become scarcer and the demand for chocolate is outstripping the supply, and the available land for cropping is being out competed by more lucrative crops in South America. At some point the available land for many crops will be exhausted. It is then that we reach peak agriculture?
There is a recent iPos MORI study that evaluated the perception and reality of issues in 14 western, industrialized countries to determine how well the perception of the populace matched reality. The US was one of those surveyed. No surprise, most Americans’ perception is very different than reality because the news and politics get in the way of the facts. The study found for example that Americans perceived that teenage birth rates were 24 % of girls vs the real number of 3%, that 32% of the population is immigrants vs 13% actual, and that the majority of people perceiving welfare were black vs. the reality of 39% (38% are white and 15% Hispanic). The states with the largest number of welfare recipients are in the northeast, which are also the states that received the smallest amount of federal funding per capita. Talk about misperceptions.
While other countries have similar misperceptions, perpetuating misconceptions is part of the extreme discourse in Congress and among different constituencies. When we perceive the issues incorrectly and our elected officials do nothing to improve that perception? What does that say about them? No wonder we cannot get infrastructure to the top of our funding needs? They perceive if you get water, can drive on it or flush it away, things must be fine?