Summer Kids – Get them early
FAU sponsors summer camps for middle schoolers on campus. The camps are a week long. The kids come it and learn about some aspect of civil engineering. I did two summer camps for civil engineers – I call it the make it and break it camps, because that is what we do. Make stuff, then break it. The kids love the breaking part. We tried out a series of project – dropping eggs from 2 and 5 stories, concrete Frisbees, concrete cylinders, geotechnical fill made of recyclables, did a little surveying, made bridge. Then broke stuff! They had fun, but it really speaks to a larger issue.
I see the University of Miami recruiting an 8th grader for the football team. College and pro sports do this all the time (recall they were scouting LeBron James in middle school or earlier). Why do we not do this in our industry? Getting middle schoolers on campus is great; they think it is really cool, but we need to keep in contact. Future camps, seminars, invitations for research participation, helping with clubs, offering classes, mentoring. All things we need to do to track the kids right into the college and the industry. If an FAU professor mentors you and puts your name on a paper, you think that kids is going elsewhere?
Sports sees money in athletes, but because only the athletics are spending money, it makes the athletes seem more important than other professions. But we all need water. We all need sewer. We all need many things we take for granted. So perhaps the colleges and industry needs to think about how we elevate our profession to those kids we want to have become part of our organization. Most do not have the talent to play sports, so get left out. But I am convinced that middle school is the place to start recruiting them our way. High school is too late and they are too distracted by “life.” Middle schoolers can be “formed” into future water professionals. Let’s think on that.
Meanwhile enjoy their work….

I have a question – what was the impact of the 2008 economic crisis on water and sewer infrastructure funding? I have a hypothesis – the amount of monies transferred to non-water and sewer operations increased. Is the hypothesis true?
Curtailed water use and conservation are common topics of conversation in areas with water supplies limitations. As drought conditions worsen, the need for action increases, so when creating a regulatory framework, or when trying to measure water use efficiency, water supply managers often look for easily applied metrics to determine where water use can be curtailed. Unfortunately, the one-size-fits-all mentality comes with a potential price of failing to fully grasp the consequences decision-making based on such metrics.
A week or so ago, on a Sunday afternoon, I flew across Middle America to Colorado for a meeting and was again struck by the crop circles that dominate the landscape west of the Mississippi River. They are everywhere and are a clear sign of unsustainable groundwater use. I recently participated in a fly in event for National Groundwater Association in Washington DC, where several speakers, including myself, talked about dwindling groundwater levels and the impact of agriculture, power and economies. The impact is significant. Dr. Leonard Konikow, a recently retired USGS scientist, noted that he thinks a portion of sea level rise is caused by groundwater running off agriculture and from utilities and making its way to the ocean. He indicated that 5% of SLR each year was caused by groundwater runoff, and has upped his estimates in the past 10 years to 13%. This is because it is far easier for water to runoff the land than seep into rocks, especially deep formations that may take many years to reach the aquifer. And since ET can reach 4 ft below the surface, many of the western, dry, hot areas lose most of this water during the summer months. Hence the impact to agriculture, and the accompanying local communities and their economies will be significant.
In the last blog we talked about Flint’s water quality problem being brought on by a political/financial decision, not a public health decision. Well, the news get worse. Flint’s deteriorated water system is a money thing as well – the community has a lot of poverty and high water bills, so they can’t pay for improvements. They are not alone. Utilities all over the country have increasing incidents of breaks, and age related problems. So the real question then is who are the at risk utilities? Who is the next Flint? It would be an interesting exercise to see if a means could be developed to identify those utilities at risk for future crises, so we can monitor them in more detail as a means to avoid such crises.


