A recent Rolling Stone article outlines a potentially dismal future for south Florida. I was quoted in the article and give the author a bunch of information. It is hard to write articles that “pop” in the popular press while conveying facts and figures. But I would suggest that the future is not quite as dismal as the article depicts. The sea level rise has been ongoing for at least 140 years as indicated by the Key West tidal station, the longest running tidal gauge in the world, but the amount has been 9 inches since 1920. True it appears that the sea level rise may be accelerating as a result of warming temperatures in the atmosphere that causes the oceans to expend, plus the loss of ice that runs off from glaciers, but 3 feet by 2100 seems the average or maybe the high average. That is unlikely to inundate all of south Florida, but keeping the water table low will be a challenge. I suggest that the challenge can be met and accomplish two goals. In low lying areas the impact of sea level rise is really manifested as increasing groundwater tables. An increased groundwater table means less soil storage capacity, which means smaller rainstorms will cause flooding. The increased flooding is already creating a demand by residents for solutions from local public officials. We have used exfiltration trenches (French drains) for many years, but increasing water tables will mean many of these systems will not function as they may be currently. But what if we reverse the concept? Instead of exfiltration, what if we allowed the water to infiltrate the pipe and go to a central wet well, and then pump the water out of the wet well? I further suggest that the dumping large quantities of groundwater to the ocean or canals may not be permittable as a result of high nutrients, so what if this water is instead pumped to a water plant as a raw water supply? Wouldn’t that solve two problems at once? Lots of excess fresh water supplies in an era where there are significant limitations in fresh water supplies? Just thinking…..